Data visualization showing PlexRank ROE analysis of Vancouver and Burnaby multiplex investment opportunities with precision targeting
Market Analysis Featured

98% of Vancouver Multiplex Lots Won't Make You Money: Here's How to Find the 2% That Will

8 min read

VanPlex's PlexRank analysis of 90,000 rezoned lots reveals Vancouver's median ROE is just 15%. Only 2% of properties deliver 100%+ returns. The era of general multiplex optimism is over—precision investing using proprietary data is the only path forward.

Key takeaway

Data-driven analysis of 90,000 rezoned multiplex lots in Greater Vancouver revealing that only 2% deliver investment-grade 100%+ ROE.

Explains why Vancouver's median ROE of 15% and combined Vancouver-Burnaby ROE of 20% fall below viability thresholds. Details the 1.25 FSR Net Zero strategy that separates profitable projects from break-even ones, Burnaby's policy friction reducing GFA by 33-45% on smaller lots, and how PlexRank identifies the precise addresses worth pursuing.

What this covers

  • ROE viability analysis
  • PlexRank methodology
  • 1.25 FSR optimization
  • Net Zero density bonus
  • Burnaby policy friction
  • precision property selection
  • cost-to-value arbitrage
  • investment-grade identification
ROE-analysis plexrank vancouver burnaby multiplex investment-strategy

Only 2% of the 90,000 rezoned multiplex lots in Greater Vancouver deliver 100%+ ROE—the threshold that justifies development risk in today’s high-cost environment. VanPlex’s PlexRank analysis reveals that Vancouver’s median ROE is just 15%, while combined Vancouver-Burnaby achieves only 20%. The era of general multiplex optimism is over; precision investing using proprietary data is the only viable path forward.

TL;DR (Key Takeaways)

  • 90,000 homes rezoned under GVRD multiplex policies (Vancouver R1-1, Burnaby R1 SSMUH)
  • Vancouver median ROE: ~15% (dangerously close to minimum viability threshold)
  • Vancouver-Burnaby combined median ROE: ~20%
  • Only ~25% of rezoned properties are financially lucrative with standard execution
  • Only ~2% of lots deliver 100%+ ROE—the true investor-grade opportunities
  • Vancouver’s 1.25 FSR advantage (Net Zero + exclusions) is the key profit multiplier
  • Burnaby’s recent policy changes reduced GFA by 33-45% on smaller lots
  • PlexRank by VanPlex identifies the exact addresses worth pursuing

Zoning is a Volume Play—Profit is a Precision Game

The Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) multiplex policies—Vancouver’s R1-1 and Burnaby’s R1 SSMUH—have rezoned close to 90,000 homes. This is the Volume. But for investors, the only number that matters is the Return on Equity (ROE), the return on the value of the property.

The reality, proven by VanPlex’s PlexRank Analysis, is eye-opening:

MarketMedian ROEAssessment
Vancouver (R1-1)~15.0%Dangerously close to minimum viability
Vancouver + Burnaby Combined~20.0%Still below institutional threshold
Target for Investment-Grade100%+Only ~2% of properties qualify

Vancouver’s median ROE of ~15% is dangerously close to the minimum threshold required to justify the risk of a multi-unit project with today’s high soft costs and construction costs (often $2.3M-$3.5M for the build alone).

Even including Burnaby, where land coverage and construction costs are often slightly more favourable, the median ROE is only 20%.

The political narrative focuses on supply. Your focus must be on viability. VanPlex analysis shows that only about one-quarter (25%) of rezoned properties in these two major markets are financially lucrative with standard execution.


The 1.25 FSR Vancouver Profit Multiplier

In Vancouver, the difference between a break-even project and a home run is found in the FSR mechanics—the Floor Space Ratio. Most builders stop at the 1.0 FSR maximum obtainable via the Density Bonus payment. This places them squarely in the 15%-45% ROE range.

The 2% Gold Standard:

The properties that achieve 100%+ ROE—the true game-changers—unlock the hidden FSR:

  • 1.25 FSR Advantage: Achieved by pursuing Net Zero Energy standards and strategically utilizing specific density exclusions granted by the City of Vancouver (CoV) for technical construction features
  • The Cost-to-Value Arbitrage: This specialized design expertise yields a massive increase in sellable square footage (up to 25% over 1.0 FSR)

Crucially, this additional square footage does not attract Density Bonus charges or DCL charges, decreasing the proportional cost of land per saleable square foot.

FSR StrategyTypical ROE Range% of Builders Using
Standard 1.0 FSR15%-45%~95%
Net Zero 1.25 FSR100%+~5%

Hard-Hitting Takeaway: If your pro forma doesn’t incorporate the maximum CoV exclusions and the Net Zero bonus (which has a deadline for applications), you are leaving the only significant profit on the table.


Burnaby’s Policy Friction: The Shrinking Envelope

While Vancouver’s challenge is about maximizing FSR, Burnaby’s R1 SSMUH struggle is about defending the building envelope against policy risk.

Recently, NIMBY-driven backlash has had a tangible effect. Oversized box-like structures triggered a public-led change to multiplex sizing rules. The push to reduce height from four to three storeys (10m max) and reduce lot coverage represents a direct cut to achievable floor area.

Impact on Gross Floor Area (GFA):

Lot TypePre-Policy ChangePost-Policy ChangeGFA Reduction
Small Lots12,000 sq ft potential7,900 sq ft or less33-45%
Larger LotsMarket-sized unitsStill viableMinimal

The Land Cost Squeeze Nuance:

The new policy’s negative effect is concentrated on smaller lots. Burnaby’s bigger lots technically penciled out at 12,000 square feet of building, but market realities (unit sizes too large and expensive) already required cutting back to ~7,900 sq ft.

For smaller lots, the land cost per buildable square foot has increased significantly. You must filter for lots that inherently work within the new, tighter 3-storey envelope without relying on aggressive height or lot coverage limits that were subsequently rolled back.

Parking Headache: The push to increase parking minimums from 0.67 to 1 stall per unit adds significant non-revenue-generating space and cost to the pro forma, especially when not near a Frequent Transit Network (FTN) area.


The Time for General Optimism is Over

This is a market for surgical precision. As an investor, your goal is to find the ~2% of lots that deliver the 100% ROE returns that truly justify the risk.

This requires proprietary data and specialized design knowledge—not just basic zoning maps and construction approaches like “a duplex with a laneway and call it good.”

What Separates the 2% from the 98%:

  1. Geometry: Frontage, depth, and corner lot advantages
  2. FSR Optimization: Net Zero certification + CoV exclusions
  3. Market Timing: Understanding policy windows and deadlines
  4. Pro Forma Precision: Full accounting of DCLs, DCCs, soft costs, and realistic sales prices

PlexRank by VanPlex transforms the investment approach from hunting for good deals to pre-knowledge of the exact address—avoiding the 85% of properties that would produce marginal results or even losses.


How Much Does Multiplex Development Cost in Vancouver?

The total cost to develop a multiplex in Vancouver ranges from $2.3M to $3.5M for a typical fourplex to sixplex. This breaks down to:

Cost CategoryRange
Construction$1.8M-$2.8M ($400-500/sqft)
Design & Permits$150K-$250K
City Fees (DCL, DCC, Density Bonus)$400K-$600K
Soft Costs & Contingency$150K-$300K

The math only works when end value exceeds 4X development cost. This is why precision in property selection is non-negotiable.


Your Next Steps

To identify properties in the 2% investment-grade category or learn how you can participate in VanPlex’s next 100% profit project:

Visit VanPlex.ca to:

  • Check your property’s eligibility and ROE potential using the advanced proforma calculator
  • Access PlexRank data for Vancouver and Burnaby
  • Connect with specialized multiplex development partners
  • Explore co-investment opportunities

David Babakaiff Co-Founder, VanPlex PlexRank | Profit with Multiplex

Frequently asked questions

What percentage of Greater Vancouver's rezoned multiplex lots deliver 100%+ return on equity?

Only 2 percent of the 90,000 homes rezoned under Vancouver's R1-1 and Burnaby's R1 SSMUH multiplex policies deliver 100 percent or higher return on equity, the threshold VanPlex's PlexRank analysis treats as justifying development risk. The remaining lots either fall below institutional investment thresholds or produce negative or marginal returns once construction costs, fees, and financing are accounted for.

What is the median return on equity for a multiplex project in Vancouver compared to Burnaby?

Vancouver's R1-1 zone has a median return on equity of 15 percent, which the article describes as dangerously close to the minimum threshold needed to justify a multi-unit project given today's construction costs of 2.3 to 3.5 million dollars. Combining Vancouver and Burnaby together raises the median to 20 percent, still below what institutional investors typically require.

How does the 1.25 FSR Net Zero strategy separate the top 2 percent of Vancouver multiplex sites from the rest?

Most builders stop at the standard 1.0 floor space ratio obtainable through the Density Bonus payment, which puts their projects in a 15 to 45 percent return on equity range. Builders who instead pursue Net Zero Energy standards and use specific density exclusions granted by the City of Vancouver can access a 1.25 floor space ratio, adding up to 25 percent more sellable square footage that is exempt from Density Bonus and Development Cost Levy charges, which is what pushes returns into the 100 percent or higher range.

How did Burnaby's recent zoning policy change reduce buildable area on smaller lots?

Burnaby reduced its maximum multiplex height from four storeys to three storeys, capped at 10 metres, and cut lot coverage in response to public backlash against oversized box-like buildings. On small lots this cut Gross Floor Area from a pre-policy potential of 12,000 square feet down to 7,900 square feet or less, a reduction of 33 to 45 percent, while larger lots saw a smaller impact since market realities had already pushed them toward similar unit sizes.

How did Burnaby's parking requirement change affect multiplex project economics?

Burnaby increased its minimum parking requirement from 0.67 to 1 stall per unit, which adds non-revenue-generating space and cost to a project's financial model, especially for a lot that is not near a Frequent Transit Network area. That increase compounds the effect of the reduced building envelope, since the parking now competes with living space for the same reduced buildable area.

What does a typical Vancouver multiplex development cost, broken down by category?

Total development cost for a typical fourplex to sixplex in Vancouver ranges from 2.3 to 3.5 million dollars, made up of 1.8 to 2.8 million dollars in construction at 400 to 500 dollars per square foot, 150,000 to 250,000 dollars in design and permits, 400,000 to 600,000 dollars in city fees including Development Cost Levies, Development Cost Charges, and density bonus payments, and 150,000 to 300,000 dollars in soft costs and contingency.

What four factors separate the 2 percent of Vancouver multiplex lots that produce investor-grade returns?

The top-performing sites combine favorable lot geometry, meaning frontage, depth, and corner-lot advantages, floor space ratio optimization through Net Zero certification and City of Vancouver exclusions, correct timing around policy windows and application deadlines, and pro forma precision that fully accounts for Development Cost Levies, Development Cost Charges, soft costs, and realistic sale prices. Missing any one of these factors is what typically pushes a project out of the top 2 percent and into marginal or losing territory.

What end value does a Vancouver multiplex project need relative to its development cost to work financially?

The article states that the math only works when a project's end value exceeds four times its development cost, given total development costs of 2.3 to 3.5 million dollars for a typical fourplex to sixplex. That threshold is presented as the reason precision in selecting which specific property to develop is not optional, since most rezoned lots do not clear it.

Free 12-page guide for Vancouver-area homeowners. Build, sell, hold, or partner — side-by-side comparison of the numbers, timeline, and risk on each path.

Verified phone required. We'll text you the link in 60 seconds.

David Babakaiff

David Babakaiff

Co-Founder, VanPlex | 25+ Years BC Construction

David Babakaiff is Co-Founder of VanPlex with 25+ years scaling BC construction. He led Alair Homes Vancouver to the 2024 HAVAN Award for Best Multiplex Unit in the GVRD. VanPlex’s PlexRank™ algorithm scores residential parcels across BC for multiplex conversion potential under Bill 44.

Want insights like this delivered weekly?

Join 2,500+ property owners getting ROI case studies, market data, and exclusive opportunities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.